Haystone Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner maintains that a distribution received by it in the amount of $368,200 on March 1, 1923, under the resolution of February 15,1923, declaring a dividend of which its share was that amount, was an ordinary dividend to the extent of $206,983.42,
Article 1545, Regulations 62 provides that “ where a corporation distributes all its property in complete liquidation or dissolution, the gain realized by the stockholder from this transaction, computed under section 202, is taxable as a dividend to the extent that it is paid out of earnings or profits of the corporation accumulated since February 28, 1913.”
Accordingly the difference between the $473,400.00 received in liquidation and the cost of the stock $457,818.00 or $15,582.00 is held to be profit taxable as dividends.
Following the principles laid down in our previous decisions, our judgment in this case must be for the petitioner, regardless of whether the portion of the dividend in question was an ordinary dividend or a distribution in liquidation. E. G. Perry, 9 B. T. A. 796; Deposit Trust & Savings Bank, Executor, 11 B. T. A. 706; Frank D. Darrow, 8 B. T. A. 276; Philetus W. Gates, 9 B. T. A. 1133; Eric A. Pearson, 16 B. T. A. 1405. Cf. James Dobson, 1 B. T. A. 1082; A. B. Nickey & Sons, 3 B. T. A. 173.
Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.