Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
Opinion
*2168 The legal reserves of a stock life insurance corporation are within its invested capital for 1920.
OPINION.
STERNHAGEN: The respondent determined a deficiency of $6,421.56 in petitioner's income and profits tax for 1920. The proceeding was submitted upon the following stipulation:
The petitioner is an Illinois corporation which filed its return for the calendar year 1920 in the First Collection District of Illinois. In computing petitioner's excess profits tax, the respondent excluded from petitioner's invested capital the amount of $4,054,637.99 as it stood on December 31, 1919, which sum was composed of reserve funds required by law as policy reserves to protect the policyholders, within the meaning of section 234(a)(10), Revenue Act of 1918. The respondent allowed $423,452.11 net addition to reserve required by law during 1920.
*2169 Although not expressly so stipulated, the arguments on both sides take it as true that the petitioner was a stock and not a mutual corporation. But in either event, the decision must go against respondent. If petitioner was a mutual company, its contention is authoritatively supported by
Respondent cites
Reviewed by the Board.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.