U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1892

Patten v. Cilley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided April 22, 1892 · Nelson, Putnam, Webb

50 F. 337; 1 C.C.A. 522; 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243

Counsel

Marry Bingham, John M. Mitchell, and Frank S. Streeter, for plaintiff in error., William L. Foster, Barmy D. Hadlock, and Daniel Barnard, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Patten v. Cilley (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire 1894)
Lockhart v. New York Life Ins. (4th Cir. 1934)
Arthur v. Edmunds (5th Cir. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Webb, District Judge.

We think that there has been no final decision in the circuit court, and that this court has no jurisdiction in error in the present stage of the case. Under the decision of the supreme court in Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins, 114 U. S. 262, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 880, the defendant in error is entitled to a judgment for the costs arising on the motion to dismiss. It is accordingly ordered that the writ of error be dismissed, with costs for the defendant incident to the motion to dismiss, including any costs incurred by him in printing the record, and that a mandate issue forthwith,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.