U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1892

Watson v. Stevens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided October 29, 1892 · Aldrich, Circnit, Colt, Putnam

53 F. 31; 3 C.C.A. 411; 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1444

Counsel

Frederick P. Fish and W. K. Richardson, for appellant., William A. McLeod, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Central California Canneries Co. v. Dunkley Co. (9th Cir. 1922)
Board of Councilmen v. Deposit Bank (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky 1902)
Post v. Beacon Vacuum Pump & Electrical Co. (1st Cir. 1898)
Nessley v. Ladd (Or. 1897)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Ordered, that whereas, it appears from the suggestion of the counsel for the appellees made in open court, and accompanied with a verified petition and affidavits, that the appellees conceive that they will have just cause for application for leave to file a hill of review and to proceed with such bill, this court reserves to *35the appellees liberty to file such application, and proceed thereon and on such bill of review in the circuit court as the circuit court may determine ; and this order shall form a part of the mandate in this canse, which shall issue forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.