U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1892

Tarr v. Rosenstein

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided October 19, 1892 · Colt, Nelson, Webb

53 F. 112; 3 C.C.A. 466; 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1456

Counsel

Benjamin F. Butler and Eugene J. Hadley, (Eugene J. Hadley, oi counsel,) for plaintiffs in error., William F. Slocum and Winfield S. Slocum, for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Bankers Surety Co. v. Security Trust Co. (D.C. Cir. 1912)
American Surety Co. of New York v. North Packing & Provision Co. (1st Cir. 1910)
Wood v. Brown (8th Cir. 1900)
John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Hurley (1st Cir. 1945)
Spruks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (3d Cir. 1943)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Davis (4th Cir. 1942)
Martin v. Clarke (7th Cir. 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons stated in his opinion, that the trustee proceedings afft >rd no ground for withholding from the defendants in error the benefit of the supersedeas bond, and that they are entitled to interest on the full amount of the decree entered June 28, 1890, without deduction on account of the trustee proceedings. Judgment affirmed, with interest and costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.