U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1893

Herrick v. Cutcheon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided February 3, 1893 · Cubiam, Helsoh, Putham, Webb

55 F. 6; 5 C.C.A. 21; 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1514

Counsel

Charles A. Taber, for appellants., Alexander P. Browne, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Brookstone Mfg. Co. (1st Cir. 1917)
Mack v. Levy (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York 1894)
CFTC v. Zelener, Michael (7th Cir. 2004)
Cochran v. M & M TRANSP. CO. (1st Cir. 1940)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PEE CUBIAM.

Whatever may he the practice of the circuit court as to drawing out decrees before they become effective as such, it is plain that the docket entry in this case, containing only the words, “Opinion — Decree for complainants,” does not constitute a decree for an injunction required to give this court jurisdiction, nor can the docket entry he aided for that purpose by reference to the opinion. The appeal was taken prematurely, and is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.