U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1895

California Fig Syrup Co. v. Putnam

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided July 26, 1895 · Aldrich, Nelson, Putnam

69 F. 740; 16 C.C.A. 376; 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425

Counsel

E. A. Bakewell, Paul Bakewell, Warren & Brandéis, and Louis I). Brandéis, for appellant., Pish, Richardson & Storrow, Frederick P. Fish, and James J Storrow, Jr., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. (1st Cir. 1906)
Dadirrian v. Yacubian (1st Cir. 1900)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions of the circuit court in this cause, but we do not wish to be understood to approve all the cases cited in its opinion. It is sufficient to refer to Medicine Co. v. Wood. 108 U. S. 218, 2 Sup. Ct. 436, and to the underlying principles oí Church v. Proctor, 13 C. C. A. 426, 66 Fed. 240, decided by this court February 2, 1895, as supporting the line of reasoning found in that opinion. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.