U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1901

Bank of Topeka v. Eaton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided April 5, 1901 · Brown, Circuir, Colt, Ter, Webb

107 F. 1003; 47 C.C.A. 140; 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053

Counsel

Nelson H. Loomis (George A. Sanderson, Harry L. Kollins, and Overmeyer, Mulvane & Gault, on the brief), for plaintiff in error. Henry Wheeler (Edward W. Hutchins, on the brief), for defendants in error Eaton & Fuller. Mayhew K. Hitch, for defendants in error Sanford & Keeley and others. Charles T. Gallagher, for defendants in error Richardson and others.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce (Tex. App. 1924)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

TER CURIAM.

This court concurs in the reasoning of Judge Putnam, holding that the declaration is insufficient and sustaining the demurrer. Our conclusion therefore is, and it is so ordered, that the judgment of the circuit court he affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error. 100 Fed. 8. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.