U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1914

Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided April 22, 1914

213 F. 449; 130 C.C.A. 586; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1903

Counsel

Mr. Kinney, for plaintiff in error., John S. Patton, of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Duke v. Committee on Grievances of the Supreme Court (D.C. Cir. 1936)
Saunders v. Piggly Wiggly Corporation (District Court, W.D. Tennessee 1924)
Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar Association (8th Cir. 1976)
George L. Ginger Et Ux. v. Avern Cohn, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ginger Machine Products Corporation, Bankrupt (6th Cir. 1958)
Re Harriet Bouslog, an Attorney at Law (Haw. 1956)
In re Sawyer (Haw. 1956)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The court, having fully considered the affidavit of prejudice filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, and the brief in support-thereof, is of the opinion that the statute under which the affidavit is filed, namely, section 21 of the Judicial Code of March 3, 1911, is so framed that evidently it does not apply to an appellate tribunal. Consequently the affidavit must be dismissed.

Ordered that the affidavit filed by the plaintiff in error on March 10, 1914, entitled “An Affidavit of Prejudice under the Statute of March 3, 1911,” is dismissed, and the case will stand for trial in the order heretofore assigned to it.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.