Gallardo v. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- (PC) Holston v. Viera Rosa (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)
- Phillips-Kerley v. City of Fresno Fire Department (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2019)
- Domenech v. Porto Rican Leaf Tobacco Co. (1st Cir. 1931)
- Gonzalez v. Gallardo (1st Cir. 1929)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was filed by the appellant before printing the transcript of the record.
On March 4,1927, Congress amended section 48 of the Organic Act of Porto Rico by adding thereto the following paragraph:
“That no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax imposed by the laws of Porto Rico shall be maintained in the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico.” Act March 4, 1927, 44 Stat. c. 503, pp. 1418, 1421 (48 USCA § 872).
In accordance with a statute of the Legislature of Porto Rico, approved April 23, 1927, entitled “An act to protect Porto Rican tobacco and cigars- against fraud and adul
In its bill of complaint the tobacco company alleges that this inspection fee is an excise tax. While denominated an inspection fee, it is in reality a tax assessed upon the appellee, and clearly falls under the inhibition of the Act of March 4,1927.
The motion of the appellant is granted, and the cause is remanded to the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico, with directions to vacate the decree heretofore entered by it in this cause, and to dismiss the same for want of jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.