U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1947

National Labor Relations Board v. Cutler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided January 3, 1947

158 F.2d 677; 19 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2160 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Arnold Ordman, of Washington, D. C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Thomas B. Sweeney, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner., Julius Kirle, of Boston, Mass., for respondent Oscar Cutler.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pugh & Barr, Inc. (4th Cir. 1952)
National Labor Relations Board v. Auburn Curtain Co., Inc (1st Cir. 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Since the respondents in this case urged no objections at any stage of the proceedings before the Board, and since no “extraordinary circumstances” are suggested to excuse their failure or neglect to do so, they cannot now object to a decree enforcing the Board’s order. See § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 454, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e); National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388, 389, 66 S.Ct. 553, and eases cited. Moreover an examination of the record discloses that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.