U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1961

General Tire & Rubber Company v. Local No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio

General Tire & Rubber Company v. Local No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided October 20, 1961
294 F.2d 957; 49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2004; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3404 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)
General Tire & Rubber Company v. Local No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

294 F.2d 957

GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LOCAL NO. 512, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 5827.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

October 20, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island; Edward William Day, Judge.

Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom John L. Clark, Knight Edwards, Providence, R. I., Belkin, Barnett, Kent & Shapiro, Cleveland, Ohio, and Edwards & Angell, Providence, R. I., were on brief, for appellant.

Bertram Diamond, with whom Baker & Diamond, Stamford, Conn., was on brief, for appellees.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We find no merit in the appellant's contentions, all of which were considered and rejected by Judge Day in his opinion reported D.C.D.R.I.1961, 191 F.Supp. 911.

2

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.