H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., 352 F.2d 87 (1st Cir. 1965)
147 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 233
Aldrich, Hamlin, McENTEE, Per Curiam

H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a finding of invalidity of a process patent for pretreating French fried potatoes so they will fry to a substantially even color. The facts and an extensive discussion are found in the opinion of the district court, 236 F. Supp. 601. Without deciding whether the evidence justified a conclusion that the patent claims in suit are invalid because wholly inoperative, we think the evidence supports the court’s holding that they are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because of the extent of experimentation required of one skilled in the art in order to ascertain their “teaching.”

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
H. C. BAXTER & BRO., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. the GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Inc., Defendant, Appellee
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published