USCA1 Opinion

          October 22, 1992      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


                                 ____________________

          No. 92-1505

                                    JOHN R. LANE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                 ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ___________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 

                     [Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                              Torruella, Circuit Judge,
                                         _____________

                      Brown* and Bownes, Senior Circuit Judges.
                                         _____________________

                                 ____________________

                Matthew Cobb for appellant.
                ____________
                Jon  Laramore,  Assistant   Attorney  General,   Government
                _____________
          Bureau,  with whom  Scott Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  was on
                              _________________
          brief for appellee.



                                 ____________________


                                 ____________________




                              
          ____________________

          *  Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.











                    Per Curiam.   Upon full  review of the  record in  this
                    __________

          case, and having considered  the briefs and oral argument  of the

          parties,  the decision  of  the district  court  is affirmed  for

          substantially the same  reasons as  are stated  in said  opinion.

          See Lane v. Cellucci, No. 91-12704 (D. Mass. March 11, 1992).
          ___ ____    ________

                    Affirmed.  Costs to appellee.
                    ________













































                                         -2-