United States v. Shaw

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Shaw

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion




October 9, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]






____________________


No. 92-1718

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

RICHARD SHAW,

Defendant, Appellant.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Andrew A. Caffrey, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________

____________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Richard A. Shaw, on brief pro se.
_______________
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Tobin N. Harvey,
__________________ ________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________

























Per Curiam. The terms of this court's remand did
__________

not call for an evidentiary hearing, but rather for the

sentencing judge simply to review the matter and state what

his original sentencing intention was. Consequently, the

sentencing judge did not err in refusing to hold an

evidentiary hearing, to appoint counsel, or to recuse

himself.

Affirmed.
________





































-2-







Reference

Status
Published