United States v. Shaw
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
United States v. Shaw
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
October 9, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
____________________
No. 92-1718
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
RICHARD SHAW,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Andrew A. Caffrey, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Richard A. Shaw, on brief pro se.
_______________
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Tobin N. Harvey,
__________________ ________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. The terms of this court's remand did
__________
not call for an evidentiary hearing, but rather for the
sentencing judge simply to review the matter and state what
his original sentencing intention was. Consequently, the
sentencing judge did not err in refusing to hold an
evidentiary hearing, to appoint counsel, or to recuse
himself.
Affirmed.
________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Published