USCA1 Opinion

          December 17, 1992     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


                                 ____________________

          No. 92-1680

                              REMCO DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                  ORECK CORPORATION,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                              Torruella, Circuit Judge,
                                         _____________

                      Brown* and Bownes, Senior Circuit Judges.
                                         _____________________

                                _____________________

          John  Foskett, with  whom  Eric I.  Zucker  and Deutsch  Williams
          _____________              _______________      _________________
          Brooks  DeRensis  Holland &  Drachman,  P.C., were  on  brief for
          ____________________________________________
          appellant.
          Gary W.  Smith, with whom Thomas  D. Burns, Patricia B.  Gary and
          ______________            ________________  _________________
          Burns and Levinson, were on brief for appellee.
          __________________



                                 ____________________


                                 ____________________

                              
          ____________________

          *  Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.














                    Per Curiam.  We affirm the district court opinion  with
                    __________

          respect to counts II-IV  for the reasons stated in  that opinion.

          Appellant  did not appeal the district  court's judgment on count

          I.   See Remco Distributors,  Inc. v. Oreck  Corporation, No. 91-
               ___ _________________________    __________________

          40106 (D. Mass. April 28, 1992).

                    Affirmed.
                    ________