Camoscio v. Commonwealth of Mass
Camoscio v. Commonwealth of Mass
Opinion
March 23, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 92-2386 FRANK J. CAMOSCIO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND THE BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PODIATRY, Defendants, Appellees. __________________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge
] ___________________ Before Torruella, Cyr and Boudin Circuit Judges
. ___________________ Frank J. Camoscio
on brief pro se. Scott Harshbarger
, Attorney General, and Beth D. Levi
, Assistant Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of the Motion for Summary Affirmance for appellees. __________________ __________________ Per Curiam
. We have reviewed the record in this case and are persuaded that this action, the appellant's third against the defendant Board of Registration in Podiatry, is frivolous, vexatious, and barred by
res
judicata
, the Rooker
doctrine, and the statute of limitations. See
Rooker
v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Street
v. Vose
, 936 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1991)(per curiam). Accordingly, the appellees' motion for summary disposition is allowed and the judgment dismissing the instant complaint is affirmed. We further affirm the district court's order enjoining the appellant from filing any further actions without either obtaining leave of court or the aid and signature of counsel.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.