Glidden v. United States
Glidden v. United States
Opinion
May 25, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 93-1152 JOSEPH R. GLIDDEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
Before Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Perry O'Brian on brief for appellant.
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and Michael M.
DuBose, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous. Counsel adequately informed appellant of the government's proposed plea offer and of the likely sentencing benefit of cooperating with the government. The judgment is summarily affirmed pursuant to First Circuit Rule 27.1. -2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.