U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1993

Rauh v. Daniels

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided August 11, 1993

1 F.3d 1231; 1993 WL 302108 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

1 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.

George K. RAUH, etc., Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Robert DANIELS, etc., Defendant, Appellee.

No. 93-1634.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

August 11, 1993

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

George K. Rauh on brief pro se.

John C. Boeckeler and Roussos, Hage & Hodes on Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Dismissal of Appeal, for appellee.

D.N.H.

AFFIRMED.

Before Cyr, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of dismissal is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and district court.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.