United States v. Montoya

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Montoya

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









September 23, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________


No. 93-1211

JUAN CAMILO-MONTOYA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]
___________________


____________________


No. 93-1270

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

JUAN CAMILO-MONTOYA,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________


















____________________


Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Juan Camilo-Montoya on brief pro se.
___________________
Edwin J. Gale, United States Attorney, and James H. Leavey,
______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________















































Per Curiam. This is a consolidated appeal from two
___________

district court orders - one, dated January 6, 1993, of

District Judge Torres and the second, dated February 18,

1993, of Senior District Judge Boyle. We have reviewed the

record and the parties' briefs. We affirm essentially for

the reasons stated in those respective orders.

Affirmed.
_________







































-3-







Reference

Status
Published