U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1994

Boateng v. United States

Boateng v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided July 25, 1994

Boateng v. United States

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 94-1092 SAFU BOATENG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. A. David Mazzone, Senior U.S. District Judge]

Before Torruella, Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.

Safu Boateng pro se on Memorandum in support of appeal brief.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J. Pelgro, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

July 22, 1994

Per Curiam. We affirm the dismissal of appellant's

2255 petition essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. Because appellant received the mandatory minimum sentence, he was not prejudiced by counsel's failure to argue for a lower sentence. United States v. Sepulveda,

15 F.3d 1161, 1201-02 (1st Cir. 1993) (because defendant received the mandatory minimum sentence, a role-in-the- offense reduction would have had no effect on the sentence and consequently court refused to decide whether or not appellant was a minor participant), cert. denied, 1994 U.S.

Lexis 4738 (1994).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.