Rosen v. Chang
Rosen v. Chang
Opinion
October 17, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 94-1179
JAMES WILEY NICHOLS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen C. Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
James Wiley Nichols on brief pro se.
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, and Juan A. Pedrosa,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
Per Curiam. Petitioner, James Wiley Nichols,
appeals from the denial of his second petition under 28
U.S.C. 2255 to set aside, vacate or correct his sentence.
For the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm its
decision dismissing the petition as an abuse of the writ and
amending petitioner's sentence to substitute the term of
special parole imposed with a term of supervised release of
identical length.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished