U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1994

Englehart v. Raikey

Englehart v. Raikey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided March 1, 1994

Englehart v. Raikey

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









February 28, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________


No. 93-1985




WILLIAM F. ENGLEHART,

Petitioner,

v.

PAUL RAIKEY, WARDEN M.C.I. WALPOLE,

Respondent.


__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

___________________

Before

Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

William F. Englehar on brief pro se.
___________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and William J.
___________________ ___________
Duensing, Assitant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
________



__________________

__________________



















Per Curiam. For the reasons stated in the memorandum
___________

and order of the United States District Court for the

District of Massachusetts, dated May 24, 1993, the judgment

of the court denying the petition for habeas corpus is

affirmed.
________











































-2-







Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.