Vandecasteele v. Fisichella
Vandecasteele v. Fisichella
Vandecasteele v. Fisichella
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
March 28, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 93-2104
STEPHEN VANDECASTEELE, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
ANGELO R. FISICHELLA, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Stephen J. Vandecasteele on brief pro se.
________________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Stephen Dick, Assistant
__________________ ____________
Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary
Affirmance for appellees.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the parties'
__________
briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment of the district
______
court for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum of
Decision, dated September 7, 1993.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.