U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1994

Vandecasteele v. Fisichella

Vandecasteele v. Fisichella
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided March 29, 1994

Vandecasteele v. Fisichella

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









March 28, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 93-2104

STEPHEN VANDECASTEELE, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

ANGELO R. FISICHELLA, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Stephen J. Vandecasteele on brief pro se.
________________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Stephen Dick, Assistant
__________________ ____________
Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary
Affirmance for appellees.


____________________


____________________





















Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the parties'
__________

briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment of the district
______

court for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum of

Decision, dated September 7, 1993.





















































Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.