Velez Vda deFontanez v. Jefferson Pilot

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Velez Vda deFontanez v. Jefferson Pilot

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









August 15, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________


No. 93-2268




MARTA VELEZ VDA DE FONTANEZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JEFFERSON PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellee.

__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

___________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

Jose L. Delgado Cadilla and Castro & Delgado Cadilla on
_________________________ __________________________
brief for appellant.
Jose Hector Vivas and Vivas & Vivas on brief for appellee.
_________________ _____________



__________________

__________________





















Per Curiam. Plaintiff requested a voluntary
____________

dismissal without prejudice. The district court "granted"

plaintiff's motion, but dismissed with prejudice and denied

plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, which objected to the

dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff has appealed from those

orders.

While neither the plaintiff nor the district court

referred to any particular rule, we conclude that the

dismissal plaintiff requested, and the court entered, was

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (voluntary dismissal by

order of court), as there is no basis in the record before us

for an involuntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We

conclude that the court abused its discretion in dismissing

with prejudice without first giving plaintiff the opportunity

to withdraw her request for voluntary dismissal. In this

regard, we agree generally with the discussions in Gravatt v.
__________

Columbia University, 845 F.2d 54, 55-56 (2d Cir. 1988), and
___________________

Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1037 (4th Cir. 1986),
______________________

that if a plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice is

to be denied, the plaintiff ordinarily should be given the

opportunity to allow the case to proceed on the merits,

rather than being subjected to a dismissal with prejudice.

Plaintiff asks that we direct the district court to

dismiss without prejudice. We will not do so because on the

present record we can not say that plaintiff was entitled as



-2-















a matter of law to an unconditional dismissal without

prejudice. We summarily vacate the order of dismissal and

remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Loc. R. 27.1.

Vacated and remanded.
____________________











































-3-







Reference

Status
Published