Mergeson v. Springfield Terminal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Mergeson v. Springfield Terminal

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









August 11, 1994 [Not For Publication]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 93-2108

DAVID MARGESON,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,
_____________

Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________

and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
_____________

____________________

Thomas Lesser and LESSER, NEWMAN, SOUWEINE & NASSER on brief
_____________ _________________________________
for appellant.
John B. Tewksbury, Karen M. Thursby, and JOHN J. C. HERLIHY
__________________ ________________ __________________
& ASSOCIATES on brief for appellee.
____________

____________________




____________________


















Per Curiam. Appellant having declined to file a
___________

response to the show-cause order heretofore issued by this court,

we summarily affirm the judgment below on the basis of the

Supreme Court's opinion in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall,
_______________________ _________

62 U.S.L.W. 4609 (U.S. June 24, 1994). See 1st Cir. Loc. R.
___

27.1.



Affirmed. Costs to appellee.
________






































2







Reference

Status
Published