Rosen v. Chang

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Rosen v. Chang

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









October 17, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT




____________________


No. 94-1179

JAMES WILEY NICHOLS,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO


[Hon. Carmen C. Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

James Wiley Nichols on brief pro se.
___________________
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, and Juan A. Pedrosa,
______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________


____________________














Per Curiam. Petitioner, James Wiley Nichols,
___________

appeals from the denial of his second petition under 28

U.S.C. 2255 to set aside, vacate or correct his sentence.

For the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm its

decision dismissing the petition as an abuse of the writ and

amending petitioner's sentence to substitute the term of

special parole imposed with a term of supervised release of

identical length.

Affirmed.
________
















































Reference

Status
Published