USCA1 Opinion

        November 23, 1994       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


                                 ____________________


        No. 94-1745 

                                  AZUBUKO E. CHUKWU,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                        CHIEF ADULT PROBATION OFFICER, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.


                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________
                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________
                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________

                                 ____________________

            Azubuko E. Chukwu on brief pro se.
            _________________
            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney  General,  and  Margaret  C.  Parks,
            __________________                            ___________________
        Assistant  Attorney  General,  on  brief  for  appellee,  Chief  Adult
        Probation Officer.
            Richard L. Barry, Jr.,  Middlesex County Sheriff's  Department, on
            _____________________
        brief for appellee, Assistant Clerk, Middlesex County Jail.


                                 ____________________


                                 ____________________
























                      Per Curiam.  The dismissal of appellant's complaint
                      __________

            for lack  of federal subject matter  jurisdiction is affirmed
                                                                 ________

            for the reasons contained  in the district court's Memorandum

            of Decision and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, dated

            May 11, 1994.











































                                         -2-