United States v. Levy-Cordero
United States v. Levy-Cordero
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 93-1679
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
VICTOR LEVY-CORDERO, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 93-2015
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM ROMERO-LEWIS, A/K/A CACO, EL TENIENTE, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 93-2087
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
JOSE SAMUEL FORTY-ESTREMERA, A/K/A SAMMY, Defendant - Appellant.
Before
Torruella, Chief Judqe,
Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Cyr, Circuit Judge.
ORDER OF COURT
Entered November 7, 1995
The United States of America has filed a "Motion for Modification and Correction of Opinion" seeking two changes in the Court's opinion. The following is the disposition of said
requests:
1. Footnote 1 is amended to read "twelve years" in substitution of "twelve months."
2. The last full paragraph of page 13 of the opinion of the Court is amended to read:
For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the improper remarks were not so prejudicial as to require reversal. Notwithstanding our decision in this regard, we repeat our concern that, "after numerous warnings from this court, the prosecuting attorneys in the District of Puerto Rico persist in spiking their arguments with comments that put their cases at risk." United States v. Ortiz-
Arrigoitia,
996 F.2d 436, 441(lst Cir. 1993)
(collecting cases). See, e.g., Udechukwu,
11 F.3d 1101; Arrieta-Aqressot,
3 F.3d 525. When, as in
this case, a visiting Justice Department prosecutor conducts the trial, we nevertheless expect the resident United States Attorney to insure that the expectations of the court concerning closing argument be made known.
It is so Ordered.
By the Court:
FRANCIS P. SCIGLIANO,
Clerk.
By Janice M. O'Neil Chief Deputy Clerk.
[cc: Messrs: Weiner, Geigel, Inserni and Ms. Mitchelll
Reference
- Status
- Published