Berg v. State of RI

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Berg v. State of RI

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion









February 8, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 94-1984

JANICE M. BERG,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND


[Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Janice M. Berg on brief pro se. ______________



____________________


____________________



















Per Curiam. Plaintiff's action essentially sought __________

federal court review of state family court proceedings.

Because lower federal courts do not have the authority to

review such proceedings, we affirm the dismissal of

plaintiff's action. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. _____________________________

413, 415-16 (1923); Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st __________________

Cir. 1990).

Affirmed. ________












































Reference

Status
Published