USCA1 Opinion

          May 4, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________


        No. 94-2273

                           DAVID A. and CATHERINE M. JONES

                                     Appellants.

                                          v.

                           E. MARK NOONAN, TRUSTEE, ET AL.,

                                      Appellees.


                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE


                   [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                          Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            David A. Jones on brief for appellants.
            ______________
            Nancy H. Michels and Michels & Michels on brief for appellees.
            ________________     _________________


                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________























                 Per Curiam.  Appellants David and Catherine Jones appeal
                 __________

            the order  of  the United  States  Bankruptcy Court  for  the

            District of  New Hampshire, dated  June 7, 1994,  affirmed by

            the district court, granting appellees relief, pursuant to 11

            U.S.C.    362(d), from  the automatic  stay provision  of the

            Bankruptcy Code, in order  that appellees might continue with

            their attempt  to evict  appellants from  property appellants

            had leased in  Gloucester, Massachusetts.  Appellants  failed

            to seek  a stay of  this order pending  appeal.  See  Fed. R.
                                                             ___

            Bank.  P.  8005.   Appellees  thereupon  obtained  a writ  of

            execution from the Massachusetts housing court and appellants

            were removed from the leased property on June 13, 1994.  This

            judgment, which is now  final, is entitled to full  faith and

            credit before  this court.  See  28 U.S.C.   1738.   Since we
                                        ___

            can  no longer  provide any  effective relief  to appellants,

            this  case must  be dismissed  as  moot.   See  In re  Public
                                _________  __  ____    ___  _____________

            Service  Co. of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469, 471-76 (1st Cir.
            _____________________________

            1992)  (case moot  where failure  to seek stay  of bankruptcy

            court  order  resulted  "in circumstances  were  no effective

            relief can be provided").