Hallahan v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Hallahan v. United States

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



____________________


No. 95-1290


DAVID C. HALLAHAN,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

David C. Hallahan on brief pro se. _________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Timothy Q. Feeley, ________________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.


____________________

August 8, 1995
____________________





















Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record. We __________

affirm for substantially the reasons stated in part B of the

district court's opinion. Petitioner's allegations were too

conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________











































-2-












Reference

Status
Published