USCA1 Opinion

          July 21, 1995

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT









                                 ____________________





        No. 95-1625



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                               REX W. CUNNINGHAM, JR.,



                                Defendant, Appellant.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                 [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Barbara J. Sweeney and Jack F. St. Clair on brief for appellant.
            __________________     _________________

            Donald K.  Stern, United States  Attorney, and  Todd E.  Newhouse,
            ________________                                _________________

        Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.





                                 ____________________



                                 ____________________







































                      Per  Curiam.    This  is an appeal from a pre-trial
                      ___________



            detention order.   We  have independently reviewed  the facts



            and the record, while giving deference to the findings of the



            magistrate  judge and  district court.  See United  States v.
                                                    ___ ______________



            O'Brien,  895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir. 1990).  For essentially
            _______



            the reasons  stated in the magistrate  judge's Memorandum and



            Order, dated May 10, 1995, we affirm the detention order.



                 Affirmed.
                 ________