United States v. Ramon Robles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Ramon Robles

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion




November 21, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



____________________


No. 95-1087

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

CESAR RAMON ROBLES,

Defendant, Appellant.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Joel D. Landry on brief for appellant. ______________
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Zechariah Chafee, __________________ ________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________























Per Curiam. In this appeal, Cesar Roman Robles ___________

challenges the district court's denial of his motion to

dismiss his indictment for having illegally reentered this

country after having been deported. See 8 U.S.C. 1326. We ___

affirm essentially for the reasons given in the district

court's order, finding Robles' appellate arguments to be

without merit. See Loc. R. 27.1. ___

Affirmed. _________





































-2-






Reference

Status
Published