Halloran v. Bosquet
Halloran v. Bosquet
Opinion
April 22, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 95-2041
PAUL J. HALLORAN, ETC, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
MICHAEL BOSQUET, ETC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
Bruce D. Todesco for appellants.
James R. Lee, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Jeffrey B.
Pine, Attorney General, was on brief for appellee Michael Bosquet.
Kathleen M. Powers, with whom Marc DeSisto and Desisto Law
Offices were on brief for appellees Town of Middletown, Robert A.
Gibson, Vincent Truver, Robert Sylvia and Officer Frank Campagna.
Per Curiam. In this case the appellant was permitted, Per Curiam.
in effect, to amend his complaint by oral representations to the
trial judge to describe in detail the facts that he was prepared
to prove in order to show that the police had unconstitutionally
manufactured evidence against him. There is no claim that
inadequate discovery was permitted or that on any underlying fact
there were two different versions of events and that trial was
needed in order to determine what happened. Taken as true, we do
not think appellant's factual allegations amounted to a constitu-
tional claim that the evidence was manufactured or that the
Constitution was otherwise violated.
Affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.