U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1996

State Street Bank v. Brockrim, Inc.

State Street Bank v. Brockrim, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided July 8, 1996
State Street Bank v. Brockrim, Inc.

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 95-2347

WILLIAM BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PETER O'MALLEY, Defendant - Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]

Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Stahl, Circuit Judge.

Valeriano Diviacchi, with whom Diviacchi Law Office was on brief for appellant.

Ronald Kovner, with whom Christopher J. Muse and Merita Hopkins were on brief for appellee.

June 18, 1997

Per Curiam. Upon full consideration of the record,

Per Curiam. briefs and argument of counsel, we affirm the decision of the district court on the basis of its rulings on October 24 and 25, 1995, on Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.

We believe that appellant's contentions on appeal are completely without merit. Because we find this to be a frivolous appeal, we order appellant's counsel to show cause within ten days of the issuance of this opinion why double costs and attorney's fees on appeal should not be assessed against him. See Fed. R. App. P. 38; 28 U.S.C. 1927.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.