Van Rye v. Murphy
Van Rye v. Murphy
Opinion
96 F.3d 1430
NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
John N. VAN RYE, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Harold B. MURPHY, Defendant, Appellee.
No. 96-1463.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Sept. 16, 1996.
George R. Desmond on brief for appellant.
Andrew G. Lizotte, Harold E. Murphy and Hanify & King, P.C. on brief for appellee.
Andrew G. Lizotte, Harold E. Murphy and Hanify & King, P.C. on brief for appellee.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, CYR and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
Upon careful review of the briefs and record, we find no error in the bankruptcy court's determination, In re Van Rye, 179 B.R. 375, 378-79 (Bankr.D.Mass. 1995), that the trustee had standing to object to the debtor's homestead exemption claim. See First National Bank v. Norris, 701 F.2d 902, 904 (11th Cir. 1983); see also In re Duda, 182 B.R. 662, 665 n. 1 (Bankr.D.Conn. 1995); In re Michael, 185 B.R. 830, 836-37 (Bankr.D.Mont. 1995).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.