USCA1 Opinion

          May 29, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 96-1027







                       JOSEPH SANDERS HAAS, JR., ETC., ET AL.,



                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,



                                          v.



                               BENT & JOHNSON, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE



                   [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Selya, Boudin and Stahl,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Joseph S. Haas, Jr. on brief pro se.
            ___________________







                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________









                      Per Curiam.  The  action was properly dismissed for
                      __________































            lack  of federal  jurisdiction.   Complete diversity  did not



            exist and plaintiff stated no federal claim.



                      Affirmed.
                      ________































































































                                         -3-