USCA1 Opinion

        July 31, 1996           [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 95-1713

         



                                   MICHAEL L. LONG,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                 PROGRESSIVE CONSUMERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                       [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Michael L. Long on brief pro se.
            _______________

            Michael  P. Duffy, Harvey Weiner and Peabody & Arnold on brief for
            _________________  _____________     ________________

        appellee IAG Federal Credit Union.





                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________





































                      Per  Curiam.      Appellee  has  informed  us  that
                      ___________



            appellant's bankruptcy action was dismissed with prejudice on



            July 8, 1996;  thus this action is no longer  affected by the



            automatic bankruptcy  stay.   Having  carefully reviewed  the



            parties' briefs  and the relevant  record on this  appeal, we



            conclude   that  no   substantial   question  is   presented.



            Accordingly,  the judgment  in  favor of  IAG Federal  Credit



            Union is summarily affirmed.   See Loc. R. 27.1.
                               ________    ___











































































                                         -2-