United States v. Allen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
United States v. Allen
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-1263
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
CARLTON E. ALLEN,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Robert A. Levine on brief for appellant. ________________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Jonathan R. Chapman and ________________ ____________________
F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for ________________
appellee.
____________________
August 22, 1996
____________________
Per Curiam. The defendant appeals his conviction __________
for possession of a short barrel shotgun in violation of 26
U.S.C. 5861(d), contending that the gun was found as the
result of a pretextual stop of his vehicle by the police.
Because this case is controlled by the recent decision in
Whren v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 1769 (1996), we affirm the _____ _____________
judgment below.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Published