United States v. Allen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Allen

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 96-1263


UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

CARLTON E. ALLEN,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Robert A. Levine on brief for appellant. ________________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Jonathan R. Chapman and ________________ ____________________
F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for ________________
appellee.


____________________

August 22, 1996
____________________
















Per Curiam. The defendant appeals his conviction __________

for possession of a short barrel shotgun in violation of 26

U.S.C. 5861(d), contending that the gun was found as the

result of a pretextual stop of his vehicle by the police.

Because this case is controlled by the recent decision in

Whren v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 1769 (1996), we affirm the _____ _____________

judgment below.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________





































-2-






Reference

Status
Published