Maddox v. Walker
Maddox v. Walker
Opinion
86 F.3d 1151
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leo L. MADDOX, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PFC WALKER, Private First Class, Badge 102, in his
individual and official capacity; Kenneth H.
Mattison, Judge, in his individual and
official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7955.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 30, 1996.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-3142-3-18-BC)
Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Walker, No. CA-95-3142-3-18-BC (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Leo L. Maddox v. Pfc Walker, Private First Class, Badge 102, in His Individual and Official Capacity Kenneth H. Mattison, Judge, in His Individual and Official Capacity
- Status
- Unpublished