U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 1997

Evans v. Bath

Evans v. Bath
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Decided February 27, 1997
108 F.3d 328; 1997 WL 85789 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Evans v. Bath

Opinion

108 F.3d 328

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Marie EVANS, Petitioner,
v.
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 96-2178.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Feb. 27, 1997.

James W. Case and McTeague, Higbee, MacAdam, Case, Watson & Cohen on brief for petitioner.

Michelle Jodoin LaFond and Norman, Hanson & DeTroy on brief for respondent.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon careful review of the administrative record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the Administrative Law Judge's findings should not be overturned. Those findings, contrary to claimant's assertion of permanent work-related elbow and respiratory impairments, must be accepted because they are supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. See Bath Iron Works Corp. v. White, 584 F.2d 569, 573 (1st Cir. 1978).

2

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.