Cotto v. United States
Cotto v. United States
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 96-1457
EVELYN COTTO, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee,
Peter John Porrata,
Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Keeton*, District Judge.
Manuel Suarez, with whom Jose R. Franco was on brief, for appellant. Miguel A. Fernandez, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Guillerm o Gil, United States Attorney, and Fidel A. Sevillano Del Rio, Assistant United States Attorney, were on brief, for the United States.
June 10, 1997
*Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.
Per Curiam. Because the putative appellant, Peter John
Porrata, is not and has never been a party to the underlying
civil action, he does not have standing to appeal the district
court's denial of the plaintiffs' second Rule 60(b) motion. See
Karcher v. May,
484 U.S. 72, 77(1987); Diamond v. Charles,
476 U.S. 54, 63-64(1986); United States v. AVX Corp.,
962 F.2d 108, 113-14(1st Cir. 1992); Dopp v. HTP Corp.,
947 F.2d 506, 512(1st
Cir. 1991). The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished