Torres v. Chater
Torres v. Chater
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1026
LUIS TORRES,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Robert W. Lovegreen, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
Morris Greenberg on brief for appellant.
Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, Michael P. Iannotti,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Wayne G. Lewis, Assistant
Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, on brief for appellee.
August 20, 1997
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and
the record on appeal. Dr. Gibson's examination found that
claimant had a normal range of motion in his knees,
notwithstanding the indication of early osteoarthritis
revealed by the x-ray. Claimant's normal range of motion
rebuts his claim that he met Listing 9.09(A) of appendix 1.
We note that the magistrate-judge concluded that the
claimant's failure to oppose the Commissioner's motion to
affirm the judgment "alone" sufficed as reason to grant that
motion. This is error, as the magistrate still must
determine that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as
a matter of law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Nonetheless,
the error was harmless as the magistrate thereafter recounted
and analyzed the evidence and correctly concluded that there
was substantial evidence to support the decision of the
administrative law judge.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished