Barth v. VISX, Inc.
Barth v. VISX, Inc.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1156
JOHN S. BARTH,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
VISX, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
John S. Barth on brief pro se.
Maureen A. MacFarlane, Lee T. Gesmer and Lucash, Gesmer &
Updegrove, LLP, on brief for appellee.
August 26, 1997
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and
the record on appeal. We affirm the order of the district
court, dated August 19, 1996, essentially for the reasons
stated in the district court's memorandum of the same date.
As for the motion to recuse, we will assume arguendo that
appellant intended to file the motion in the present case and
mistakenly put an earlier case number on the motion but, in
any event, we affirm the order of the district court dated
October 22, 1993, denying the motion for recusal, essentially
for the reasons stated in the district court's order.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished