MSM v. Zurich
MSM v. Zurich
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 97-1484
MSM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
[Hon. Zachary R. Karol, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
Jordan Lewis Ring, with whom Philipp G. Grefe, David R.
Jackowitz and Ring & Grefe, P.C. were on brief for appellants.
Frederick W. Stein, with whom Laurence H. Reece, Jeffrey
Levy, Heidlage & Reece, P.C., Steven D. Pearson and Bates Meckler
Bulger & Tilson were on brief for appellee.
September 18, 1997
Per Curiam. After a full review of the record, briefs, Per Curiam.
and arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the matter was
properly resolved by the district court. The doctrine of
collateral estoppel or issue preclusion made the earlier
Massachusetts state court determination against appellants
binding in the present federal court action. See 28 U.S.C.
1738. Massachusetts may follow the Restatement of Judgments,
28(5)(c) (1982), in recognizing a limited exception where the
party opposing collateral estoppel makes a clear and convincing
showing that it was deprived of the opportunity to obtain a full
and fair adjudication in the earlier case, but no such showing
was made by the appellants in this case. Accordingly, we do not
reach appellants' other claims of error which, as both sides
agree, are of no importance once collateral estoppel is found to
apply.
Affirmed. Affirmed.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished