Tunnicliff v. Moriarty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Tunnicliff v. Moriarty
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1390
PAUL W. TUNNICLIFF,
Appellant,
v.
DENIS MORIARTY, JR.,
Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Philip M. Stone on brief for appellant. Paul M. Cranston and Cranston & Cranston, P.C. on brief for appellee.
September 25, 1997
Per Curiam . We have carefully reviewed the parties'
briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm on grounds that
appellee Moriarty neither wilfully violated the stay nor caused
appellant Tunnicliff's injuries.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
The request in Appellee's brief for costs is denied insofar as it arises under Fed. R. App. P. 38. Appellee may be awarded costs under Fed. R. App. P. 39 by complying with the procedures stated therein.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished