United States v. Penn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

United States v. Penn

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 97-1276

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ALVIN PENN,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,

Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Paul J. Haley on brief for appellant.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J. Pelgro,

Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

October 14, 1997

Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and

record, we find no merit in appellant's arguments.

Particularly, we decline appellant's invitation to expand the

concept of sentence factor manipulation in this case. As the

district court found, with adequate support, that the

government's conduct was proper and that appellant was

predisposed to the drug sales, there was no cognizable basis

for a claim of sentence factor manipulation. See United

States v. Montoya,

62 F.3d 1, 3-4

(1st Cir. 1995).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished