Foster v. Wal-Mart

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Foster v. Wal-Mart

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________


No. 96-1662

ARLENE SIMS FOSTER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

Arlene Sims Foster on brief pro se. __________________
E. Tupper Kinder and Nelson, Kinder, Mosseau & Gordon, P.C. on _________________ ________________________________________
brief for appellee.


____________________

March 3, 1997
____________________
















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and __________

the record on appeal. Appellant, Arlene Sims Foster,

challenges only the district court's dismissal of her common

law claim of wrongful discharge and her claim of intentional

and negligent infliction of emotional distress. We affirm

that dismissal essentially for the reasons stated in the

district court's order of March 15, 1996.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. _________





































-2-






Reference

Status
Published