USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 96-1862



                                  ROBERT E. CAMERON,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                                 JOHN NOONAN, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Selya, Boudin and Lynch,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Scott  Harshbarger, Attorney  General, and Elisabeth  J. Medvedow,
            __________________                         ______________________

        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.





                                 ____________________



                                    March 5, 1997

                                 ____________________











































                      Per Curiam.  After carefully  reviewing the record,
                      __________



            we  affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially
                ______



            the reasons  stated in its  Memorandum and Order,  dated June



            20,  1996.   See  Local  Rule  27.1.    Appellant  Robert  E.
                         ___



            Cameron's   motions   for   speedy   consideration   and  the



            appointment of counsel are denied.
                                       ______



















































































                                         -2-